Stanley Szeto Lever Style
Cover Stanley Szeto, chairman of Lever Style

Stanley Szeto, chairman of apparel supply chain manager Lever Style, on the strategies he used to transform his failing family business and tackle the economic challenges that lie ahead

I’ll always remember that evening back in 2000, when my father sat me down and said: “Son, please mentally prepare yourself—our family business is about to go bankrupt.” After the shock of his announcement had subsided, I asked to take over the business. I was just 25 and in the finance industry at the time, but hoped a miracle might yet happen.

My only two conditions to my father were that I be given free rein and that he retire, which he did immediately, to his credit. It was an uphill battle: We had negative equity and were literally struggling to make payroll the next week. Our shirtmaking company, Lever Shirt, was being brought to the brink of bankruptcy by one of our smaller outfits, a branding and retail business.

Today, as Lever Style—an apparel supply chain manager—our books tell a vastly different story. We’ve been listed on the Hong Kong stock exchange since 2019 and are a key supply partner to e-commerce pioneers such as Bonobos and Stitch Fix, as well as premium brands including Paul Smith, Hugo Boss Theory, and Coach. For the first half of this year, our sales jumped 66 per cent over the same period last year and our net profits almost tripled.  These results came on the back of our 64 per cent growth in full year 2021 over 2020.

Here’s how we did it.

Leave no sacred cows.

In order to do things in a new way, we had to clean house in a big way. A year after I took over, six out of the eight most senior people in the company— including my father—had gone. When my staff saw this, they quickly realised there were no sacred cows and that, unlike in many family businesses, there would be no patriarchy protecting the old guard.

Next, I had to deal with the cancer that was eating our main business alive—our small branding and retail business. Business School 101 dictates that if you can’t make it work, close it down. But that wasn’t an option because closing the business would have meant massive write-offs on our balance sheets due to the account receivables and inventory related to this business. Closing it would have meant breaking all bank covenants and immediate death as all the banks would sever our lines.

Given my background in mergers and acquisitions, I looked for strategic partners and found a small company with significant angel investor funding that was doing fashion, branding, and retail in China. We merged with them and no longer had to finance the operating losses of the combined business, instead being able to focus on righting the ship of our main business. We broke even in 2021 and eked out a small profit in 2022.

Plan for the unpredictable.

Back in 2005, I’d publicly predicted that China’s worldwide market share of apparel production would jump from what it was at that time (around 40 per cent) to double that, because I was seeing similar trends in other light manufacturing industries such as bicycles, light bulbs, and toys. The reasoning was sound—after all, China had joined the WTO, and the quota regime (where countries could only ship a certain amount of apparel to the developed world) was coming to an end.

But China’s market share did not jump as predicted, mainly because it was going through a rapid cost inflation of 15 to 20 per cent yearly, for ten years straight. From this, I learned that the world is very unpredictable and nobody knows what will happen in the next few years, whether in China or anywhere else. That’s why in 2010, we pivoted to an outsourcing strategy, moving production from our own factories to third-party ones, and from China to other locations such as Vietnam and Cambodia. This actually turned out to be a better way to serve our customers, because their needs are always changing. If we had built our own facilities, our first priority would have been to fill the facility by selling what we produce, rather than produce what our customers need.

Thinking small can sometimes pay off.

Large brands like Nike, Gap and Marks & Spencer tend to be very price-driven as they have all the capabilities they need, and they demand from suppliers a rock-bottom price—that’s a red ocean and not the way to grow a profitable business. Smaller brands, on the other hand, tend to be underserved because large factories don’t like to take small orders, meaning these smaller brands typically have trouble finding the right capacity at the right service levels.

Our largest customers between 2000-2015 were big brands like J Crew, Calvin Klein and Uniqlo but we stopped working with all of them, focusing instead on smaller premium or digitally native brands from 2016. Take menswear e-tailer Bonobos, which we started working with in 2011. We were able to provide a value-add by helping them on the entire supply chain solution because like most small companies, they’re great at branding and marketing, but can use a partner with strong back-end expertise.

I also strongly believe “high mix, low volume” is the future of retail. Take one of our clients, Shein, as an example. They launch 2,000 designs daily in small volumes, replenishing them based on consumer demand. Unlike traditional retailers which need huge gross margins at the beginning of each season in order to absorb markdowns on low-selling inventory, Shein makes only what their customers want, and their private market valuation reached US$100 billion in their last funding round, higher than the market capitalisation of Inditex (Zara’s mother company) and H&M combined.

Make bold strategic moves during tough times.

The first year of the pandemic, 2020, was the worst year ever for apparel because people stuck at home invested in things like wine and TVs, not clothing. Venerable brands and retailers like Brooks Brothers, Ann Taylor, J Crew, Debenhems, JC Penny, all plunged into bankruptcy, putting the entire upstream industry in an existential crisis.

However, we outperformed the industry with our sales having dropped just 28% from 2019, and we still managed to break even because of our flexible, asset-light business model.  With a healthy cash war chest from our 2019 IPO, we took advantage of the bloodbath by going on an aggressive acquisition spree. We acquired five companies during the pandemic, greatly enhancing our product capabilities and our strategic positioning. Next year, with a likely recession and an industry downturn, we expect strategic acquisition opportunities to surface again at reasonable prices.

We have a track record of making unconventional strategic moves that buck the trend during difficult times. In 2017, for example, when then-US President Donald Trump started the Sino-US trade war, many Chinese companies suffered because American companies didn’t want to pay the China tariffs. We were able to take advantage of the situation and grow our margins because our business model allowed us to be very flexible, moving our clients’ production from China to Vietnam and Southeast Asia.

We are also digitalising our platform, starting with two strategic additions to our board including Gary Liu, the former CEO of South China Morning Post, who oversaw the traditional newsroom’s digital transformation. Digitalising our operation will enable us to automate processes, so that things get done faster and enable us, for example, to service even smaller customers because the overheads involved on a per order basis will drop significantly.


Stanley Szeto is Executive Chairman of Lever Style Inc, an apparel supply platform for digital retail. Recognised for his vision and innovation, the Honorary Chairman of Hong Kong Textile Council won the Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year award in 2018 and is a frequent guest speaker on CNBC and other business news channels. Prior to joining Lever Style, Szeto worked at J.P. Morgan’s investment banking department and at Prudential Asset Management Asia Ltd. ("PAMA"), a pan-Asian buyout firm.

This piece is part of a collaboration between Tatler Asia and Young Presidents’ Organisation (YPO), a global leadership community of chief executives, which counts more than 30,000 members from 142 countries among its members.